unused units #84

New issue

Open

opened 2022-01-08 18:38:03 +00:00 by benibela · 3 comments

benibela commented

2022-01-08 18:38:03 +00:00

(Migrated from github.com)

It has dl and Unix,UnixType, in the uses list, but does not use them (with FPC)

So they can be removed.

Especially dl. Without dl, I can cross compile it to arm, and run it on x86_64 with qemu-arm. With dl, it does not run due to a missing .so file.

It has `dl` and `Unix,UnixType,` in the uses list, but does not use them (with FPC) So they can be removed. Especially `dl`. Without `dl`, I can cross compile it to arm, and run it on x86_64 with qemu-arm. With `dl`, it does not run due to a missing .so file.

BeRo1985 commented

2022-11-22 16:40:37 +00:00

(Migrated from github.com)

When I remove them, then I will get

thus, they should stay there, I guess.

When I remove them, then I will get ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/428863/203371007-8b4645b5-3f5a-40b9-9efc-fac5c895fea5.png) thus, they should stay there, I guess.

BeRo1985 commented

2022-11-22 16:43:57 +00:00

(Migrated from github.com)

As additional info, FLRE is now also used in commercial C++ software specifically aimed on the Linux ARM64/AArch64 target.

benibela commented

2023-10-11 15:37:44 +00:00

(Migrated from github.com)

When I remove them, then I will get

thus, they should stay there, I guess.

perhaps they need to be put in libFLRE.dpr

a program and a library have different requirements

> When I remove them, then I will get > > ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/428863/203371007-8b4645b5-3f5a-40b9-9efc-fac5c895fea5.png) > > thus, they should stay there, I guess. perhaps they need to be put in libFLRE.dpr a program and a library have different requirements